From a mythological stand point, each particular region had it's own version of a dragon. There are some commonalities between them though. Most are seen as a combination of creatures, the Middle East thought of them as Head and tail of a serpent, front part of a lion and hind legs of a falcon... In East Asia they are a combination of the horns of a deer, head of a camel, carp scales, tiger feet and eagle clawsAll are high symbolic: European and Middle Eastern traditions viewed them as the opposite of man or completely un-human; while the Asian lands viewed them in several different ways, both good and badAll viewed them as powerful (albeit sometimes fearful!)I would go on to say that it seems plausible that there existed some form of large creature that struck awe into man in every area of the globe. I think that they were called 'dragons' out of a lack of any other definition. I also think that, like all camp fire tales, became exagerations of the truth. In three hundred years, I would be interested in knowing what our descendants will think of our attitudes towards dragons. Seeing all the tatoos on people, neon signs hanging in shops, etc. How humorous would it be if this was a big practicle joke started in the Babylon (oldest version of a dragon I'm aware of: Marduk VS Tiamat) to scare little children into being good and now look where we are at!!!ZRY
I copied this from another post but it applies here equally well.QuoteFrom a mythological stand point, each particular region had it's own version of a dragon. There are some commonalities between them though. Most are seen as a combination of creatures, the Middle East thought of them as Head and tail of a serpent, front part of a lion and hind legs of a falcon... In East Asia they are a combination of the horns of a deer, head of a camel, carp scales, tiger feet and eagle clawsAll are high symbolic: European and Middle Eastern traditions viewed them as the opposite of man or completely un-human; while the Asian lands viewed them in several different ways, both good and badAll viewed them as powerful (albeit sometimes fearful!)I would go on to say that it seems plausible that there existed some form of large creature that struck awe into man in every area of the globe. I think that they were called 'dragons' out of a lack of any other definition. I also think that, like all camp fire tales, became exagerations of the truth. In three hundred years, I would be interested in knowing what our descendants will think of our attitudes towards dragons. Seeing all the tatoos on people, neon signs hanging in shops, etc. How humorous would it be if this was a big practicle joke started in the Babylon (oldest version of a dragon I'm aware of: Marduk VS Tiamat) to scare little children into being good and now look where we are at!!!ZRY ZRY